|
|
Way to Russia Talk Lounge Way to Russia warm-up: place both your hands in front of you and then count one word for each finger, starting from the left thumb: "Conversation Is a Way of Finding Out What You Think".
WayToRussia.Net Blog & Updates:
Subscribe to Way to Russia News Feeds:
 | Latest Forum Posts:
Talk Lounge Posts at Your Fingertips:
 |
|
Please, book your travel services directly through Way to Russia to support our free independent travel guide.
You will get lower prices, faster reply, and our backup in dealing with providers.
| Author |
Message |
cyndy22 Lounge Wizard
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Posts: 1078 Location: massachusetts
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I drank too much one night a few years ago and got sick. I know my husband loves me bacause he put his hands out for me to puke on! nOW THAT IS LOVE! But if I am in a normal state of mind when I get old and can't do much for myself, I agree with Mr. Barley. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if you are healthy geezer you serve just about zero purpose. We can debate this. There were very good two movies last year that dealt with euthanasia and they both fueled a very similar discussion in Roger Ebert's Answer Man column: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041226/ANSWERMAN/412260312/1023.
Two, I can understand ending the life of a person in a vegatative state, I can understand ending the life of a person in intense pain but the life of someone perfectly sentient and pain-free? The lives of all of the Ramon Sampedros of the world? Sure, it's his life and he can do whatever he wants with it but this is the death a person of the same mental capability, who's in as normal state of mind as you and me.
And then again if it's your life and you are free to do whatever you want with it why not just permit everyone to kill themselves? Why are only the suicidal who happen to be disabled, ill and elderly allowed to commit suicide? They should be allowed to but the mentally depressed shouldn't? They have an (in most cases) incurable mental disease that makes their life living hell, makes death preferable to their life and yet we send firefighters to wrestle them down from the Brooklyn Bridge? And how about restraining prisoners and Death Row inmates from killing themselves? How in God's name is that fair?
Sorry for this post, I'm in sort of a revere right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | And then again if it's your life and you are free to do whatever you want with it why not just permit everyone to kill themselves? Why are only the suicidal who happen to be disabled, ill and elderly allowed to commit suicide? They should be allowed to but the mentally depressed shouldn't? They have an (in most cases) incurable mental disease that makes their life living hell, makes death preferable to their life and yet we send firefighters to wrestle them down from the Brooklyn Bridge? And how about restraining prisoners and Death Row inmates from killing themselves? How in God's name is that fair |
Cuz in all religions and therefore most human societies, suicide and euthanasia is considered morally wrong as its is seen as the ultimate and unforgivable sin. Thats why Bush and co intervened on the Schaivo bit and why they're building suicide barriers on the Golden Gate Bridge. [/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But the death penalty isn't?!If you are absolutlely totally just have to have capital punishment, give the prisoners their razors and shoelaces back and let them die with dignity.It's either both or none.
But every single prison on planet Earth does that, to strip them of their self-respect and humanity.The nook and cranny of every Nazi on trial in Nuremberg was searched for pills from their nose holes to their foreskin.How dehumanizing.If they are going to die, even Hitler's henchmen deserve to die with honor.But Heinrich Himmler anyway outsmarted the Americans and killed himself in his cell (probably hid the pill under his globs of fat ), good for him.
Anyhow back to topic.I have mixed feelings about euthanasia.It's an impossible situation because there is no morally right decision.All you have is two bad choices to pick from.It's not as clear cut as Bush, Micheal Shiavo, advocacy groups or Jesse Jackson would have you believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | But the death penalty isn't?!If you are absolutlely totally just have to have capital punishment, give the prisoners their razors and shoelaces back and let them die with dignity.It's either both or none.
But every single prison on planet Earth does that, to strip them of their self-respect and humanity.The nook and cranny of every Nazi on trial in Nuremberg was searched for pills from their nose holes to their foreskin.How dehumanizing.If they are going to die, even Hitler's henchmen deserve to die with honor.But Heinrich Himmler anyway outsmarted the Americans and killed himself in his cell (probably hid the pill under his globs of fat Razz), good for him.
Anyhow back to topic.I have mixed feelings about euthanasia.It's an impossible situation because there is no morally right decision.All you have is two bad choices to pick from.It's not as clear cut as Bush, Micheal Shiavo, advocacy groups or Jesse Jackson would have you believe. |
Yeah but thats the hypocritical thing with the religious/moralist folk. Besides according to them its not the indivuals right to decide but God's. We're just the sheep recieving orders. BTW the death penalty in their eyes is morally justifiable. The whole eye for an eye for tooth for a tooth "logic" is in every holy book. (and apparently in this talk lounge)
If you beleive the stats in a few years the old and the infirm will greatly outnumber the young in the US, Europe, Japan and Russia. I wonder how we'll handle all of that especially since Russia, or better yet the US wont have the money, time, or patience to take care of all of them. I'm pretty sure thats when the Euthanasia laws will be relaxed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
The 60th anniversary of WW2 is coming up, the 10th of Rwanda went, both great injustices of the 20th century. When you read about it, your first reaction is extreme anger and "Hang the bastards who did this from the nearest tree" but that's not the answer.It doesn't solve anything.It won't bring you or anyone else peace.
BTW, nothing in Christianity teaches that the death penalty is right.The opposite in fact: "When your enemy strikes you on one cheek, turn the other".Christianity also teaches that war is morally wrong and if you do start one, it better be for a good, good reason, to pay lip service and show respect to other religions and that money is not meant to be kept. So I have no idea what religion it is that Bush practises, you know the one that gives him the right to execute other people, justifies war, teaches hate and makes it right for him to hourde billions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. |
Its actually from many religious sources but in Christianity's case, its from the Jewish torah which in turn is incorporated into the Bible (old testament).
| Quote: | The 60th anniversary of WW2 is coming up, the 10th of Rwanda went, both great injustices of the 20th century. When you read about it, your first reaction is extreme anger and "Hang the bastards who did this from the nearest tree" but that's not the answer.It doesn't solve anything.It won't bring you or anyone else peace.
BTW, nothing in Christianity teaches that the death penalty is right.The opposite in fact: "When your enemy strikes you on one cheek, turn the other".Christianity also teaches that war is morally wrong and if you do start one, it better be for a good, good reason, to pay lip service and show respect to other religions and that money is not meant to be kept. So I have no idea what religion it is that Bush practises, you know the one that gives him the right to execute other people, justifies war, teaches hate and makes it right for him to hourde billions. |
Thats what i've been pointing out all along and why i'm not particulary religious. Religion is hypocritical in nature and you aren't supposed to rationalize it. You're supposed to just belive it and take it as it is....faith.
Christianity may teach that war is wrong but theres instances of war in the bible. And i'm not even going to start about the Crusades. ....
[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's not quite fair, e.What about those religious leaders who condoned the war in Iraq?
Cyndy, you are a lucky woman .Most people wouldn't let their drunk best friend puke on their lawn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | That's not quite fair, e.What about those religious leaders who condoned the war in Iraq? |
You mean condemmed right?
Compared to the legions of those bible thumping maniacs in the deep south that prayed for war to happen and called Hussein satan and the anti-christ........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 534
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
They obviously don't know that Christianity (like every major religion other than Islam) abhores and forbids violence.
If it wasn't for faith, wars would happen anyway, it just serves as an excuse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | They obviously don't know that Christianity (like every major religion other than Islam) abhores and forbids violence. |
Every religion including Islam forbids violence but condones it anyway when its convinient for them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Varangian Frequent Guest
Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| e wrote: | | Quote: | | They obviously don't know that Christianity (like every major religion other than Islam) abhores and forbids violence. |
Every religion including Islam forbids violence but condones it anyway when its convinient for them. |
A religion is a way of life, a set of moral rules, a body of teachings about the basic nature of all that is. A religion is not a "them". Obviously, you are talking about people who profess a religion, and it's true that people who claim to be from various faiths may indeed condone violence when it is convenient for them. This would be an awful slander if you meant to apply it to all theists. It's also not true for all religions, I think. Some sects are so inherently pacifist that someone would have to be insane to consider himself a member of that faith and still condone violence.
Try to control your cynicism, e. I doubt that you have a comprehensive knowledge concerning one religion, let alone all of them.
I am a Christian, and I am against euthanasia, and capital punishment, in general. However, moral questions involving violence are complex, religious teachings are subtle, and sacred texts are often interpreted differently by different people. Rash generalisations are no more advisable concerning religions, than they are concerning races, countries or genders. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 654
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | A religion is a way of life, a set of moral rules, a body of teachings about the basic nature of all that is. A religion is not a "them". Obviously, you are talking about people who profess a religion, and it's true that people who claim to be from various faiths may indeed condone violence when it is convenient for them. This would be an awful slander if you meant to apply it to all theists. It's also not true for all religions, I think. Some sects are so inherently pacifist that someone would have to be insane to consider himself a member of that faith and still condone violence.
Try to control your cynicism, e. I doubt that you have a comprehensive knowledge concerning one religion, let alone all of them.
I am a Christian, and I am against euthanasia, and capital punishment, in general. However, moral questions involving violence are complex, religious teachings are subtle, and sacred texts are often interpreted differently by different people. Rash generalisations are no more advisable concerning religions, than they are concerning races, countries or genders. |
You're playing semantics and jumping to baseless conclusions. Re-read the previous posts again. We are discussing how religion is wrongly used to justify capital punishment, war, murder, and etc. You can't deny that it isn't used for that purpose now can you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Varangian Frequent Guest
Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: Elderly Russians would know better |
|
|
Re-reading posts carefully can be valuable, especially one's own. For instance, "You can't deny that it isn't used for that purpose" has one too many negatives. That's just a quibble, but I still think that the distinction between a religion and a "them" is an important one.
It was good of you to talk about, "how religion is wrongly used", which implies that it might have a correct usage. Re-reading your previous comments. such as "Religion is hypocritical in nature" still leads me to conclude that you were making a blanket condemnation of all religions. But since you now claim that you weren't, I'll take your word for it.
And yes, of course some people use their religion to justify all sorts of violence, and some people are overtly religious in order to make themselves look good, id est, hypocritical.
I suggest that we now allow this thread to die painlessly, and with dignity, unless someone wants to bring it back to the topic of the care of elderly Russians. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cyndy22 Lounge Wizard
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Posts: 1078 Location: massachusetts
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I started this thread and I would like to revert back to the original topic. The discussion about euthasia however made me think more about elderly and young people even whose health is fragile and failing. I gather that the Russian health system is not as aggressive in prolonging these people's lives, such as for example keeping people on ventilators. This probably has to due more with limited resources and technology, but may also have to do with a different philosophy about keeping people alive at all costs. Westernized medicine has somehow adopted this philosphy. Thank God we now have living wills where people can say for example do not resucitate me should I clinically die.
I know very little about health care in Russia. I question the availability of social services such as home health care in Russia. It seems to me that elderly and young people with major health problems or disabilities must rely on family. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Get this Forum's Posts / Topic at Your Fingertips:
 (If you subscribe, you will be able to track new posts in this specific forum / topic. You can use your personal Yahoo or Google page, as well as specialized RSS readers.)
WayToRussia.Net - p-h-p-B-i-B-i
|
|