| How are we doing? |
| Excellent! |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
| Good |
|
50% |
[ 4 ] |
| Average |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Poor |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Bad! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 8 |
|
| Author |
Message |
mediashark
Moderator
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 1599
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:09 pm Post subject: How are we doing? |
 |
|
| How would you rate our moderating job performance? Just need to a little bit of feedback. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jutrzenkapolska
VIP
Joined: 16 Sep 2004
Posts: 534
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Remember what it was like before you guys took the job?  Congrats on a job well done with the recent spamming spout. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
5_Zvehzda
Just Starting
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed. You guys are doing a very good job staying on top of things, and have responded viligantly against spam. My only concern, though, is the forum becoming too heavily moderated - because the last thing anyone wants is another Big Brother monitoring all of our actions - and then reporting our suspicious activities to the authorities for immediate detainment  (just kidding). But yes, you've been well organized. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mediashark
Moderator
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 1599
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 5_Zvehzda wrote: | | My only concern, though, is the forum becoming too heavily moderated - because the last thing anyone wants is another Big Brother monitoring all of our actions - and then reporting our suspicious activities to the authorities for immediate detainment |
Off to the gulag   |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
e
VIP
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 654
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One statement can sum up the rather excellent job you mods have been doing: No more Winston!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick
Moderator
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 854
Location: Касабланка
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mediashark wrote: |
Off to the gulag |
We don't need a Gulag, we have it's anarchist version already. It goes by the name 'not relevant' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anathema
Lounge Lizard
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 186
Location: Phoenix, Аризона
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I gave you guys a good rating. It should be noted I've never been on a forum that had excellent moderation, including the board I moderate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DITTRICH
WayToRussified
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 429
Location: London UK
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
A suggestion...
Some people have a habit of resurrecting ancient threads that are no longer relevant. Is is possible to automatically lock threads that have not been posted to for say 1 month?
My 2p
Les |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick
Moderator
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 854
Location: Касабланка
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
DITTRICH: We have been thinking about these.. The threads are different though. Some of them can be resurrected without any problem because the subject remains relevant (e.g. Films), sometimes it is economical to ask a similar question in an older thread..
Locking threads can lead to unnecessary duplication of discussions too.
It's up to the user's responsibility to make new threads/re-use old ones for posts. I am not sure if we should make a forum rule on this or even turn to locking threads. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
