The most popular online travel guide to Russia, since 2001.
 

Way to Russia Community and Forum


If you have a question or want to help someone, please, go to
Way to Russia Forum on our Facebook page.
 
We also invite you to join our Facebook community, where you can meet other travelers and read interesting news on topics ranging from visa regulations to culture and music.
 

 

We are currently moving the old forum to Facebook, so what you see below functions as an archive.

If you have a question, please, post it on
Way to Russia Facebook Discussions Page


 

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   ChatChat   Log inLog in 

Boris Yeltsen Dies
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge

did you support Yeltsen?
yes
40%
 40%  [ 4 ]
no
60%
 60%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 10

Author Message
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

that's the question...what is Russia destined to become?
Back to top
solis
Talk Show Host


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Wandering

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darthvader wrote:

Why not? I am trying to learn here.


Well then learn about him here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brezhnev

Quote:
Nor do I, that's why I was hoping you'd tell me. However, geopolitically, the USSR seemed to be at the peak of its global powers just before the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Confidence was up, USSR was very active in the supporting many Communist interests worldwide. No doubt the economy was booming? Then, Communism seemed like a possible system for much of the world. Then 1962. Were Russians the happiest back before then?


Happiest was never as a whole. Everyone has their own version of happy. If i remember correct, it was Kruschev who initiated the deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba, which led to the Cuban missile crisis of 1962.

If you're a fan of war and death, go live in Stalin's era. If you're a fan of peace and equality go live in Lenin's era. If you like the limbo of right in between, go anywhere between Stalin and Gorbachev. If you like poverty, go live in Gorbachev's era. It's really all a matter of preference. But if you ask me, now is the best Russia has been in a long time. There's no better time to live in Russia than now.

Quote:
Agreed. I just wanted to know if Russian quality of life (for "all" Russians) was much better say under Stalin (in the early 50s) compared to under Yeltsin? When were the best times?


Stalin or Yeltsin? Good question. If you like eating cereal in the morning where the prize in the box could be a 1 out of 5 chance ticket of getting a pardon from execution, sure, Stalin may be for you.

As for me, if i had to pick a time in Russia's past...I would probably go for the Lenin era.
Back to top
darthvader
WayToRussified


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 427

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting thought, Solis. Thanks, dude.
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think one of the best times in Russian history was just before the last century...before tsar was executed...Stalin, Lenin, Krushev, were all very bad for Russia. To admire any of them is to be so misguided. As far as Putin goes we shall see...but if the people of Russia can truly benefit from his rule then good for Russia
Back to top
solis
Talk Show Host


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Wandering

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

surfguy wrote:
To admire any of them is to be so misguided.


solis wrote:
It's really all a matter of preference.


surfguy wrote:
As far as Putin goes we shall see...but if the people of Russia can truly benefit from his rule then good for Russia


What do you mean, "We shall see"? Are you blind? They have had benefit from him.
Back to top
Mogsfan
WayToRussified


Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

solis wrote:


Are you gonna sit there and honestly tell me you thought the Soviet Union was worse off before Gorbachev? Putin has done good for Russia's economy. I don't remember saying anything good about Brezhnev either. And i don't really know enough about Kruschev to make an opinion about him.

The economy may had been bad before, but Gorbachev made it take the nose dive it did. It would be better for a economy of stagnation under Brezhnev than one that wasn't being cared for at all.

Solis, you are ignorant and so is everybody else. Yeltsin and maybe Putin (to what degree, I'm not sure) were and are, respectively, puppets. Yeltsin just didn't care to toll the line and became or was an intoxicated guy of indifference. It's a few bankers and economic elite that control Russia, the U.S. and virtually every country. At least, the western nations for certain. This minority of money makers and money changers raped Russia during the fall of the Soviet Union because it suit their purposes and it was easy to do so. It was deteriorating already and going bankrupt from the spending on the Cold War. Yeltsin was just a pawn. The IMF was and IS controlled by these money changers and it made sense for them (for their own profit) to bail out Russia when convenient and profitable. It is easier to analyze all this relating to the United States, though.

Putin's so-called reforms and changes are also made in order to make money for these people. Putin is likely (my opinion) in bed with them, too. His anti-democratic policies are useful to them. Putin probably does agree with the anti-democratic ideas but regardless, whether he does or not, it serves the purposes of the money elite and gives him political power at the same time. It was these motives that resulted in first, allowing the oligarchs to initially take advantage of the paltry economic reforms first seen in Russia and then turn around and take them when these oligarchs tried to become involved in politics. It was a good excuse and justification to control the political arena but also take over corporations for the control of these money changers while maintaining political control.
Back to top
solis
Talk Show Host


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Wandering

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mogsfan wrote:

Solis, you are ignorant and so is everybody else. Yeltsin and maybe Putin (to what degree, I'm not sure) were and are, respectively, puppets. Yeltsin just didn't care to toll the line and became or was an intoxicated guy of indifference. It's a few bankers and economic elite that control Russia, the U.S. and virtually every country. At least, the western nations for certain. This minority of money makers and money changers raped Russia during the fall of the Soviet Union because it suit their purposes and it was easy to do so. It was deteriorating already and going bankrupt from the spending on the Cold War. Yeltsin was just a pawn. The IMF was and IS controlled by these money changers and it made sense for them (for their own profit) to bail out Russia when convenient and profitable. It is easier to analyze all this relating to the United States, though.

Putin's so-called reforms and changes are also made in order to make money for these people. Putin is likely (my opinion) in bed with them, too. His anti-democratic policies are useful to them. Putin probably does agree with the anti-democratic ideas but regardless, whether he does or not, it serves the purposes of the money elite and gives him political power at the same time. It was these motives that resulted in first, allowing the oligarchs to initially take advantage of the paltry economic reforms first seen in Russia and then turn around and take them when these oligarchs tried to become involved in politics. It was a good excuse and justification to control the political arena but also take over corporations for the control of these money changers while maintaining political control.


Ok God.
Back to top
Mogsfan
WayToRussified


Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

solis wrote:

Ok God.

I encourage you to think about it and research.

People are greedy.
Back to top
solis
Talk Show Host


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Wandering

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I encourage you to get rid of your "Everyone's a tool of the system" attitude. It's really immature.
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

solis wrote:
surfguy wrote:
To admire any of them is to be so misguided.


solis wrote:
It's really all a matter of preference.


surfguy wrote:
As far as Putin goes we shall see...but if the people of Russia can truly benefit from his rule then good for Russia


What do you mean, "We shall see"? Are you blind? They have had benefit from him.




Have they benefitted? That depends on who you ask...and as a result we shall see. Too early to really tell
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mogsfan...I too agree with what you have said...this goes way way back and is very interesting. Two things that mix is oil and banking...together they represent greed. People should realize that when a bank lends money to a nation or a business or a individual the bank then has some control over the borrower. In terms of nations...usually taxes are used to repay the loan...meaning that the people suffer the burden. For bussines it's prices...which are then passed on to the consumer...or the people. And in individaul-it's an even more direct impact. But this is how the world works. Napolean is interesting to study becuase he was very anti world banking. Kennedy wanted to do away with the Federal Reserve. And the world banks funded the Russian Revolution. Anyway have to study it some more. But very interesting and easy to see.
Back to top
Crabman
WayToRussified


Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 401
Location: Middlesex

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Boris Yeltsen Dies


How can they tell?

I must say that I rather enjoyed the man. Didn't he once play the spoons on the president of Kyrgyzstan's head at a state banquet? We need more politicians like that! (Can't see Putin, Tony or Dubya doing that.)
Back to top
jo-jo-7
Just Starting


Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crabman wrote:
Quote:
Boris Yeltsen Dies


How can they tell?

I must say that I rather enjoyed the man. Didn't he once play the spoons on the president of Kyrgyzstan's head at a state banquet? We need more politicians like that! (Can't see Putin, Tony or Dubya doing that.)


Didn't he like to pinch women on the butt? I heard something about that.

Wink
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well I think most men like to pinch women on the butt...so perhaps that isn't what really distinguishes him....gggrrr Twisted Evil
Back to top
MrSpice
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3431

PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There were 3 interesting articles about Yeltzin in today's Wall Street Journal. Even I learned a few things. Wall Street Journal rocks.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5