The most popular online travel guide to Russia, since 2001.
 

Way to Russia Community and Forum


If you have a question or want to help someone, please, go to
Way to Russia Forum on our Facebook page.
 
We also invite you to join our Facebook community, where you can meet other travelers and read interesting news on topics ranging from visa regulations to culture and music.
 

 

We are currently moving the old forum to Facebook, so what you see below functions as an archive.

If you have a question, please, post it on
Way to Russia Facebook Discussions Page


 

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   ChatChat   Log inLog in 

Ukraine
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge
Author Message
uday
WayToRussified


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 323

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:44 pm    Post subject: Ukraine Reply with quote

I'm interested in hearing the Russians view on the events in Ukraine. Do you think there'll be a civil war if the real winner isn't given the leadership? Will mother Russia intervene? What does the future hold for U?
Back to top
cyndy22
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 15 Oct 2004
Posts: 1076
Location: massachusetts

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just emailed my friend in Ukraine about this. The previous email I received from Yuriy was how tense the election was. Apparently tension has increased with the protesting. I am waiting for Yuriy's email to updatee and share his thoughts and feelings about what is going on.

ps isn't it nice to have a civil communication! I am not joking. The forum is a better place when we all are here for news, support and other information and ideas relevant to Russia.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Back to top
uday
WayToRussified


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 323

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers, I'm interested in hearing about it
Back to top
wu687
Lounge Lizard


Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 199
Location: Victoria BC, Canada

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Web Camera Kyiv, Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square)

http://www.1plus1.net/video/camera.php
Back to top
Dan23
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Davis, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Umm, mother Russia won't intervene on the side of Þùåíêî. ßíóêîâè÷ is Ïóòèí's candidate.

Dan
Back to top
uday
WayToRussified


Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Posts: 323

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Care to elaborate on that dan?
Back to top
Dan23
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Davis, CA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, here' s the situation as I understand it:

Yushchenko was projected to win the election if it was carried out fairly, and when he lost, the EU suspected foul play and called for an investigation, and foreign leaders are hesitant to recognize the results (including the USA -
http://www.lenta.ru/world/2004/11/24/powell/ ).
Vladimir Putin and Leonid Kuchma (outgoing leader) are both staunch backers of Yanukovich. Ukraine has been leaning dangerously toward falling back under Russia's military umbrella (its own military is quite broke). It seems Putin is slowly trying to rebuild some kind of post-soviet coalition. He has some experience with installing pro-Kremlin candidates already (think Chechnya). I hear Belarus is already pretty much under Putin's wing.

If the protests are any indication, political progressives aren't accepting the result. (I wish that would happen here - my sig refers to the USA).

Correct me where I'm wrong.

Dan

Edit: Þùåíêî gets most of his support from nationalists in the western half, while ßíóêîâè÷ gets his support from the highly industrialized eastern half. I think ßíóêîâè÷ even wants to make Russian the national language.
Back to top
36_CKOTUHOK
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orange zombies.. huh..
I can name myself "democrat", "the one who fights for freedom", "savior of the nation" - byt I will be myself anyway, and my thoughts won't change. Why Yshenko, who has stolen $2bln only in 90-92, would became honest now? His hands are too dirty to trust him anymore.
Back to top
Dan23
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Davis, CA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as I know, from a foreign perspective, the debate at this point is not about who would be a more honest leader, but whether the election was stolen. Many western governments - including the US (how's that for irony?) - believe that it was.

Dan
Back to top
castilho
Frequent Guest


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 71
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil

PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:24 pm    Post subject: Ukraine Reply with quote

C'mon guys. Civil war is too catastrophic. Things are not like that so far. We have some brazilians football players there - Kleber and Diogo Rincón - defending Dynamo of Kiev and they say everything is under control, except the protests in the big square. They are not afraid. The life goes on. And they'll play tomorrow.
Back to top
36_CKOTUHOK
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:50 pm    Post subject: This is a choice between bad man and very bad man. Reply with quote

I think the only way to save Ukraine is to divide it and make Yanukovich to govern eastern part, while Yshenko is to govern Western part. And some kind of counsil will be used to make decisions which affect both parts.
Anyway, east will never accept Yshenko. People understand that they will face Yshenko revenge, so they support Yanukovich.
Back to top
Mogsfan
WayToRussified


Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 490

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I think the only way to save Ukraine is to divide it and make Yanukovich to govern eastern part, while Yshenko is to govern Western part. And some kind of counsil will be used to make decisions which affect both parts.
Anyway, east will never accept Yshenko. People understand that they will face Yshenko revenge, so they support Yanukovich.

This doesn't work at all. In every country that has done this, it has ultimately been a huge failure. The more overly communistic/totalitarian country eventually collapses and it brings down the other more liberal country. Look at Germany. I think the Czech Republic is doing moderately better than Slovakia but you'd have to ask Czech nationals for more info.

IMHO, a division is a bad idea. The other problem is too few people will realize the split is a bad idea and will blame a negative result on other things without admitting the truth. Even if Yushchenko is also corrupt (in his own way), the split will not be a good result for either subsequent "country" imho.
Back to top
Dan23
Frequent Guest


Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 53
Location: Davis, CA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How could one country "bring down" the other if they are both totally sovereign? I see secession on political grounds as basically a lite form of self-determination, which I always support.
For example, Chechnya. I don't see why Russia has to insist on keeping this tiny region inside its border. It seems to do more harm than good. Or can you imagine an Israeli/Palestinian state? It would be civil war.
I know these are extreme examples, but the concept is still applicable.
Not that I think every country should break up into lots of little parts based on political rivalries, but it may have advantages. For example (violent cases): if one ethnic group starts oppressing the other, isn't international intervention easier if the violence is happening across borderlines, instead of being a civil conflict?
I recognize how tentative unity can make a country stronger. But I don't think it should be forced upon people with a division along an established border (like in Ukraine). The only big fear I would have about Ukraine splitting up is the eastern half falling under Putin's "democratic" management.

These are just my thoughts - feel free to shoot down any part of them.

Dan

By the way, here's an interesting article putting the situation in some international perspective, from the San Francisco Chronicle:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/11/30/EDGDHA2DG21.DTL
Back to top
Dr-Fauste
Site Admin


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why keep it?
First, Oil
Second : Mafia
Third : Pride
Fourth : Domino effect with Tartar republics
Fifth: War keeps a government in power- aka George Orwell's 1984 and the USA(No president has been defeated in a time of crisis)
Back to top
Dr-Fauste
Site Admin


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 654

PostPosted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay what about Romanian Elections? Why is the west not crying about them?
Why is the focus on Ukraine and not both corrupted elections?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2